On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:40:14PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Friday, 6 April 2018 17:25:58 EEST jacopo mondi wrote: > > Same on the mandatory/optional VCC supply thing. Let's try to make > > next version the final one. If the optional property with the dummy > > regulator doesn't satisfy you and it is preferred to have a fixed-regulator > > anyhow in DT I'll do in next version, othewise let's try not to change > > it again. I'll just remark here that in the current Eagle design vcc is > > connected to a power rail with no regulator at all :) > I don't like the dummy regulator much, as it generates a dev_warn(), which > makes me believe that it's a hack rather than a proper solution. You might > want to ask Mark Brown for his opinion. The DT should describe the physical supplies the device needs, if that's a fixed regulator with no software control then the DT should have a fixed regulator with no software control.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
