Hi Fabrizio,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:44 PM, Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Due to commits:
> * "ARM: shmobile: Add watchdog support",
> * "ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: Add watchdog support", and
> * "soc: renesas: rcar-rst: Enable watchdog as reset trigger for Gen2",
> we now have everything we needed for the watchdog to work on Gen2 and
> RZ/G1.
>
> This commit adds "renesas,rcar-gen2-wdt" as compatible string for R-Car
> Gen2 and RZ/G1, and since on those platforms the rwdt clock needs to be
> always ON, when suspending to RAM we need to explicitly disable the
> counting by clearing TME from RWTCSRA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ramesh Shanmugasundaram <ramesh.shanmugasundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
I verified this works on R-Car Gen2, so
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Still, more comments below...
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/renesas_wdt.c
> @@ -203,13 +203,29 @@ static int rwdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * This driver does also fit for R-Car Gen2 (r8a779[0-4]) WDT. However, for SMP
> - * to work there, one also needs a RESET (RST) driver which does not exist yet
> - * due to HW issues. This needs to be solved before adding compatibles here.
> - */
> +static int __maybe_unused rwdt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rwdt_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (watchdog_active(&priv->wdev))
> + rwdt_write(priv, priv->cks, RWTCSRA);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused rwdt_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rwdt_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + if (watchdog_active(&priv->wdev))
> + rwdt_write(priv, priv->cks | RWTCSRA_TME, RWTCSRA);
Writing to this register is not sufficient on R-Car Gen3, where PSCI
suspend powers down the whole SoC. Hence all WDT register content is lost,
causing the watchdog timeout never to trigger.
Note that this issue is pre-existing, and not caused by your patch.
This can be fixed by replacing the RWTCSRA register writes in the
suspend/resume handlers by calls to rwdt_stop() resp. rwdt_start(), like is
done in the BSP in commit e406980763f18f38 ("watchdog: renesas-wdt: Support
the suspend/resume"). Note that this would cause a small change in behavior
on R-Car Gen2, where the timeout would be reset on resume, instead of
continuing where stopped before. I don't think that hurts, though.
Since I was always a bit uncomfortable with this patch doing two things at
once (1. suspend/resume, 2. "renesas,rcar-gen2-wdt" matching), I think it
would be better to take the patch from the BSP first, and add support for
"renesas,rcar-gen2-wdt" in a subsequent patch.
Does the above make sense?
Do you agree?
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
