Re: [PATCH v4 11/16] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Convert to new LVDS DT bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sergei,

On Friday, 23 February 2018 11:51:59 EET Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 2/21/2018 2:10 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The internal LVDS encoder now has DT bindings separate from the DU. Port
> > the device tree over to the new model.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi index 008a260f86a5..8660f8a329c7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -1126,6 +1123,33 @@
> >   			port@1 {
> >   				reg = <1>;
> >   				du_out_lvds0: endpoint {
> > +					remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_in>;
> > +				};
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +
> > +	lvds0: lvds@feb90000 {
> 
> I suggest that we use the label "lvds" w/o #, compatible with the manual...

The manual uses "LVDS" in some places (figure 25.1b or table 25.1 for 
instance) and LVDS0 in other (table 25.3 for instance). I don't think this is 
a big deal, and if we need to refer to the LVDS node by phandle, I'd rather 
use lvds0 consistently on all SoCs to make writing shared DT sources easier.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux