On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The Renesas Salvator-X development board can be equipped with an R-Car > H3, M3-W, or M3-N SiP, which are pin-compatible. > > Document board part number and compatible values for the version with > R-Car M3-N. > > The board part number was extracted from a big patch by Takeshi Kihara > in the BSP. That I have verified. > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt > index 82908a9447e4b051..51e4428856be4557 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/shmobile.txt > @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ Boards: > compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a7795" > - Salvator-X (RTP0RC7796SIPB0011S) Here we have: Name (Part No) > compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a7796" > + - Salvator-X (RTP0RC7796SIPB0011S (M3N)) Here we have: Name (Part No (SoC)) > + compatible = "renesas,salvator-x", "renesas,r8a77965" > - Salvator-XS (Salvator-X 2nd version, RTP0RC7795SIPB0012S) And here we have: Name (Version, Part No) > compatible = "renesas,salvator-xs", "renesas,r8a7795" > - Salvator-XS (Salvator-X 2nd version, RTP0RC7796SIPB0012S) Can we think about making this more consistent?
