Re: [PATCH net-next] sh_eth: TSU_QTAG0/1 registers the same as TSU_QTAGM0/1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 20:28:16 +0300

> The TSU_QTAG0/1 registers found in the Gigabit Ether controllers actually
> have the same long name  as the TSU_QTAGM0/1 registers in the early Ether
> controllers:  Qtag Addition/Deletion Set Register (Port 0/1 to 1/0); thus
> there's no need to make a difference in sh_eth_tsu_init() between those
> controllers. Unfortunately, we can't just remove TSU_QTAG0/1 from the
> register *enum* because that would break the ethtool register dump...
> 
> Fixes: b0ca2a21f769 ("sh_eth: Add support of SH7763 to sh_eth")
> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux