2018-02-05 7:07 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 04:45:48PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote: >> Both manufacturer and name variant. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt >> index 1812c84..dd29937 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Required properties: >> "microchip", >> "ramtron", >> "renesas", >> + "rohm", > > This is going to comflict with a patch sorting these IIRC. So they > should go thru the same tree. > >> "nxp", >> "st", >> >> @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ Required properties: >> variants of the above. Known such exceptions are listed below: >> >> "renesas,r1ex24002" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02" >> + "rohm,br24t01" - the fallback is "atmel,24c01" >> >> - reg: The I2C address of the EEPROM. >> >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html AT24 patches go through Wolfram's tree, but since he already sent his PR for 4.16, I can pick them up for 4.17 (except for Peter's sorting patch which should go in after 4.16-rc1). Thanks, Bartosz
