Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a7795: Move nodes which have no reg property out of bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > I just noticed that with this patch applied I now see:
>>> >
>>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-salvator-x.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /pmu_a57
>>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-salvator-x.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /pmu_a53
>>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-h3ulcb.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /pmu_a57
>>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-h3ulcb.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /pmu_a53arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-salvator-x.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /timer
>>> >
>>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795-h3ulcb.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-parent for /timer
>>>
>>> Right, the "interrupt-parent = <&gic>;" inside the /soc node applies to child
>>> nodes of the /soc node only.
>>>
>>> You can find this in two ways:
>
> s/find/fix/
>
>>>
>>>   1. Add "interrupt-parent = <&gic>;" to the /pmu_a57 and /pmu_a53 nodes.
>>>   2. Switch those nodes from "interrupt" to "interrupts-extended", e.g. turn
>>>
>>>         interrupts = <GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>
>>>      into
>>>
>>>         interrupts-extended = <&gic GIC_SPI 72 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>
>>> The latter is what e.g. arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-375.dtsi does.
>>
>> Thanks, I took option 1 as it seems consistent with the rest of the
>> Renesas DT files. I also added it to the /timer node.
>
> Actually we recently had a discussion about this on IRC, triggered by a
> similar issue in board files (see e.g, Ethernet PHY interrupts).
>
> Given the following comment:
>
> drivers/of/irq.c:       /* Try the new-style interrupts-extended first */
> drivers/of/irq.c:       res = of_parse_phandle_with_args(device,
> "interrupts-extended",
>
> I think it would be better to use interrupts-extended for individual/isolated
> use outside the /soc node.

I disagree. There's no point to use interrupts-extended unless you
have 2 or more interrupt parents. Just set interrupt-parent in the
root node.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux