Re: [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi: use extra flag for CBSY usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Wolfram,

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There is one SDHI instance on Gen2 which does not have the CBSY bit.
> So, turn CBSY usage into an extra flag and set it accordingly. This has
> the additional advantage that we can also set it for other incarnations
> later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Tested on a M3-W Salvator-X and H2 Lager (with both SDHI instances). I could
> move large files around without problems. Note that on the special incarnation
> without the CBSY bit, the old code still worked, so there might be a CBSY bit.
> But it is not documented, so we better play safe.

Is this supposed to have any impact on the issue on Magnus' r8a7794/alt, where
tuning failed before?

    sh_mobile_sdhi ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD19)
    sh_mobile_sdhi ee100000.sd: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt (CMD19)
    sh_mobile_sdhi ee100000.sd: Tuning procedure failed
    mmc1: tuning execution failed: -110
    mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising SD card

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux