Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhi: use maximum width for the sdbuf register

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:53:10AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:29:26PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Make use of the 64 bit sdbuf width on Renesas R-Car Gen3. If the
> > registers are 8 byte apart, the width is also 64 bit. For all others,
> > the width is 32 bit, even if the registers are only 16 bit apart.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

> > Tested on a M3-W Salvator-X and H2 Lager (with both SDHI instances). On
> > the Lager, I could reproduce the problem with the old patch. It is gone now!
> 
> Do you think there is any value in widening the test-coverage of this
> change, f.e. to older SoCs?

Current mmc/next with this patch and the CBSY patch might be worth it,
I'd think. Mounting, copying and checksumming a file should do IMO.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux