Re: [PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  * SHDMA Device Tree bindings
>
> -Sh-/r-mobile and r-car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
> +Sh-/r-mobile and R-Car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller

I'd fix "SH/R-Mobile" too, while at it.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux