[PATCH 1/7] dmaengine: use proper name for the R-Car SoC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is 'R-Car', not 'r-car'. No code or binding changes, only descriptive text.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
I suggest this trivial patch should be picked individually per susbsystem.

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
index 2a3f3b8946b998..a91920a49433c2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/shdma.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 * SHDMA Device Tree bindings
 
-Sh-/r-mobile and r-car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
+Sh-/r-mobile and R-Car systems often have multiple identical DMA controller
 instances, capable of serving any of a common set of DMA slave devices, using
 the same configuration. To describe this topology we require all compatible
 SHDMA DT nodes to be placed under a DMA multiplexer node. All such compatible
-- 
2.11.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux