Hi Geert, On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 02:55:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi all, > > The Renesas Salvator-X and ULCB development board can be equipped with > either an R-Car H3 or M3-W SiP, which are pin-compatible. All boards > use separate DTBs, but currently there's no sharing of board-specific > devices in DTS. > > This series reduces duplication by extracting common board support into > their own .dtsi files. As the level of support varies across boards and > SoCs, this requires the addition of a few external clocks and > placeholder devices on R-Car M3-W, so the common board support DTS can > refer to them. > > - Patches 1 and 2 add the external audio and PCIe bus clocks on R-Car > M3-W, which are present in r8a7795.dtsi, and used in > r8a7795-salvator-x.dts, > - RFC patch 3 adds placeholders for devices that are not yet supported > and/or tested on R-Car M3-W, but used on R-Car H3, > - RFC patch 4 extracts common Salvator-X board support, > - RFC patch 5 extracts common ULCB board support. > > For R-Car H3 based boards, there are no functional changes. > For R-Car M3-W based boards, some new devices are now described in DT. > > Dependencies: > - renesas-devel-20170420-v4.11-rc7, > - Patches 1 and 2 can be applied as-is, > - Patches 4 and 5 depend on "[PATCH 0/8] arm64: dts: renesas: Break > out R-Car H3 and M3-W SiP" > (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg173820.html). > > DTB changes have been inspected using scripts/dtc/dtx_diff. > This has been tested on Salvator-X (both H3 and M3-W). > This has not been tested on H3ULCB and M3ULCB due to lack of hardware. > > Thanks for your comments! Thanks for tackling this important problem. I have looked over the changes and they seem nice to me. I would, however, be more comfortable applying them if they were rested on the ULCB boards.
