Hi Wolfram, On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have tested with "the new mmc/next" and things seem better. > > Good. The issue you saw is expected when you have not the enablement > patches in place. > >> I am still of a mind to drop the M3-W patch of this series because unless >> we can control the order that things are merged into Linus's tree >> there will be a temporary regression there. Moreover I'm not very excited >> about renesas-next having regressed. > > I have not heard of a regression. Geert, did you report that? Did I miss > that? As you can see, I did test the patches with M3 as well: > > http://elinux.org/Tests:eMMC-HS > > and Jinso test team (Duc-san) confirmed it works for them with H3 and > M3-W. In private communication, though. The issue happened with renesas-devel, i.e. without those patches. It was mentioned during last core meeting, so have a look at that log. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
