On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > While the patch is acceptable as-is, my question is still valid: > Is there any specific reason you chose scif1 over hscif1? Conservatism. :) CU Uli
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > While the patch is acceptable as-is, my question is still valid: > Is there any specific reason you chose scif1 over hscif1? Conservatism. :) CU Uli