Hi Geert,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2017-01-11 09:42:09 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Niklas Söderlund
> <niklas.soderlund@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 2017-01-10 23:30:43 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> > Oddly enough the error are only printed when I insert the SD card in the
> >> > mmc0 slot. I can insert/eject the card multiple times in mmc1 and no
> >> > error but the first insertion in mmc0 and boom. Only difference I can
> >> > see are the clock speed between mmc0 and mmc1.
> >>
> >> Can you try this patch?
> >>
> >> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 11:10:09 +0100
> >> Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: pfc: r8a7795: WIP: hardcode TDSEL value
> >>
> >> Otherwise, AC-180M won't get probed with SDR50 and EMMY-W1 has more
> >> tuning errors with SDR104.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7795.c | 3 +++
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7795.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a7795.c
> >
> > I'm doing my tests on Koelsch so I'm afraid setting the TDSEL in
> > pfc-r8a7795.c won't do much ;-) Nevertheless I tried to mimic the patch
> > for Koelsch but found the documentation lacking and where unable to do
> > so. That is I found a TDSEL register but no documentation of its
> > content.
>
> The datasheet does mention which bits are for SD[023]_CLK.
> Actual bit patterns should be the same as on r8a7795.
Thanks for the information about the bit patterns. I tried using the
same bit pattern on SD[023]_CLK but the error persisted :-(
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
