Hi Rob, On Tuesday 06 Dec 2016 15:15:50 Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:43:29AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Make it clear that the core bridge/dw_hdmi.txt document isn't a device > > tree binding by itself but is meant to be referenced by platform device > > tree bindings, and update the Rockchip and Freescale DWC HDMI TX > > bindings to reference it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/dw_hdmi.txt | 85 +++++++---------- > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/imx/hdmi.txt | 51 +++++++------ > > .../bindings/display/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.txt | 43 +++++++---- > > 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Really, the ddc-i2c-bus prop needs to move to a connector node, but > that's a separate problem. I fully agree. One step at a time though :-) > We might also want to drop the 'ddc-' part and have a generic way to refer > to an i2c bus. There's a couple of other cases. Right, but a DT node might need to refer to multiple I2C buses (probably not for connectors though). The ddc- prefix serves a similar purpose than the power supply or GPIO name in the *-supply or *-gpios properties. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
