Re: [PATCH 5/5] tests: Test suspend/resume on active pipelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent,

On 25/11/16 17:10, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Friday 25 Nov 2016 13:59:16 Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Provide a test to verify the hardware completes a functional test whilst
>> performing a suspend resume cycle in parallel. Make use of the
>> /sys/power/pm_test functionality provided by CONFIG_PM_DEBUG to perform
>> the testing
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  tests/vsp-unit-test-0020.sh | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 tests/vsp-unit-test-0020.sh
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/vsp-unit-test-0020.sh b/tests/vsp-unit-test-0020.sh
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 000000000000..5838295139b2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/vsp-unit-test-0020.sh
>> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
>> +#!/bin/sh
>> +
>> +#
>> +# Test power-management suspend/resume whilst pipelines are active
>> +#
>> +# Utilise the basic RPF->WPF packing test case as a measure that the
>> hardware
>> +# is operable while we perform test suspend and resume, and verify that it
>> is
>> +# still successful even with a suspend resume cycle in the middle of the
>> test.
>> +#
>> +# Format iteration loops are maintained, even with only one format so that
>> this
>> +# test can be easily extended to try further formats if needed in the
>> future.
>> +#
> 
> Given that this test will suspend during the first iteration only I don't 
> think it's very useful to keep the loop.
> 

Agreed. Can you tell this test started it's life as
vsp-unit-test-0019.sh ? :D

>> +
>> +source vsp-lib.sh
>> +
>> +features="rpf.0 wpf.0"
>> +formats="RGB24"
>> +
>> +# These can be extracted from /sys/power/pm_test
>> +suspend_modes="freezer devices platform processors core"
> 
> How about extracting them from that file then ? :-) Or maybe just verifying 
> they are available before trying to use them ?

I thought about that - and looked at it.

Annoyingly - /sys/power/pm_test contains none which would need to be
filtered out, and also the active mode is surrounded by square brackets,
which would also need filtering.

# cat /sys/power/pm_test
none core processors platform [devices] freezer

They are also in the reverse order of that which I wanted the tests to run.

All solvable, but I hadn't bothered as I thought it was possibly
overkill. Of course extracting automatically does future proof us
against different modes and changing mode-names - so it does sound like
a valuable thing to do.

>> +# This extended function performs the same
>> +# as it's non-extended name-sake - but runs the pipeline
>> +# for 300 frames. The suspend action occurs between frame #150~#200
>> +test_extended_wpf_packing() {
>> +	test_start "Verify WPF packing in $format during suspend:$mode"
>> +
>> +	pipe_configure rpf-wpf 0 0
>> +	format_configure rpf-wpf 0 0 ARGB32 1024x768 $format
>> +
>> +	vsp_runner rpf.0 --count=300 &
>> +	vsp_runner wpf.0 --count=300 --skip=297
>> +
>> +	local result=$(compare_frames)
>> +
>> +	test_complete $result
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_hw_pipe() {
>> +	local format
>> +
>> +	for format in $formats ; do
>> +		test_extended_wpf_packing $format
>> +	done
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_suspend_resume() {
>> +	local test_results=0
> 
> This variable doesn't seem to be used.
> 

Another left over from when I was experimenting to get the return values
before I was blocked by $(compare_frames) returning a string.


>> +	local test_pid
>> +
>> +	# Test the hardware each side of suspend resume
>> +	test_hw_pipe &
>> +	test_pid=$!
>> +
>> +	# Make sure the pipeline has time to start
>> +	sleep 1
>> +
>> +	# Set the test mode
>> +	echo $mode > /sys/power/pm_test
>> +
>> +	# Comence suspend
> 
> Commence ?

Yes
Where can I get a terminal emulator with spell-check highlighting :D

> 
>> +	# The pm_test framework will automatically resume after 5 seconds
>> +	echo mem > /sys/power/state
>> +
>> +	# Wait for the pipeline to complete
>> +	wait $test_pid
> 
> It would be nice to add a timeout here. Maybe something like the following 
> (untested) ?
> 
> 	(sleep 30 ; kill $test_pid) &
> 	kill_pid=$!
> 	wait $test_pid
> 	kill $kill_pid
> 
> test_complete should be called here based on both whether the frames compared 
> successfully and whether the test timed out.
> 

I agree that the test should have a timeout, and result determined, but
scripting this in shell ... feels ugh :S

Its a shame we don't have gnu-timeout
 - http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/timeout.1.html(man 1 timeout)





>> +}
>> +
>> +test_main() {
>> +	local mode;
> 
> No need for the trailing ;.
> 

Ack.

>> +	local suspend_test_failures
> 
> This variable doesn't seem to be used.

Hrm .. maybe I forgot to do a fresh git-format-patch after I fixed these
up :D

> 
>> +
>> +	# Check for pm-suspend test option
>> +	if [ ! -e /sys/power/pm_test ] ; then
>> +		echo "$0: Suspend Resume testing requires CONFIG_PM_DEBUG"
>> +		test_complete skip
>> +		return
>> +	fi;
>> +
>> +	for mode in $suspend_modes ; do
>> +		test_suspend_resume $mode
>> +	done;
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_init $0 "$features"
>> +test_run
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux