On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:27:14PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Sergei Shtylyov > <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/26/2016 03:08 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> Here's the set of 8 patches against Simon Horman's 'renesas.git' > >>> repo's > >>> 'renesas-devel-20161021-v4.9-rc1' tag. I'm adding the device tree support > >>> for > >>> the R8A7743-based SK-RZG1M board. The SoC is close to R8A7791 and the > >>> board > >>> seems identical to the R8A7791/Porter board. The device tree patches > >>> depend on > >>> the R8A7743 CPG/MSSR driver series just posted in order to compile and > >>> work. > >> > >> > >> They depend only on "[PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7743: add CPG clock > >> index macros" of that series, right? > >> > >> "[PATCH v3 2/2] clk: renesas: cpg-mssr: add R8A7743 support" is not > >> needed, > > > > How would "clocks" props _work_ without this patch? > > Sorry, I was focusing too much on "compile"... > > Got my coke, switching brain to overdrive mode... As we are talking about adding support for a new SoC I would be happy to queue up code in my tree that compiles under the assumption that in v4.10 the bits to make it run will appear in other branches.
