Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: Remove unneeded check in SMP initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:04:39PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On Wednesday 05 Oct 2016 13:25:12 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > The SMP initialization function is only called if CONFIG_SMP is defined.
> > > Remove the duplicate check.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 ----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > > b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c index 02e21bceb085..48595a397220
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > > @@ -39,9 +39,5 @@ bool shmobile_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> > > 
> > >  bool __init shmobile_smp_init_fallback_ops(void)
> > >  {
> > > -       /* fallback on PSCI/smp_ops if no other DT based method is
> > > detected */
> > > -       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
> > > -               return false;
> > > -
> > >         return platform_can_secondary_boot() ? true : false;
> > >  }
> > 
> > This check was added recently, because the UP build was broken.
> 
> I should have found that out. Sorry about the noise and thanks for the review.

I am discarding this patch. Let me know if that was not what you were
after.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux