Hi Geert,
On Wednesday 05 Oct 2016 13:25:12 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The SMP initialization function is only called if CONFIG_SMP is defined.
> > Remove the duplicate check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c index 02e21bceb085..48595a397220
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp.c
> > @@ -39,9 +39,5 @@ bool shmobile_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu)
> >
> > bool __init shmobile_smp_init_fallback_ops(void)
> > {
> > - /* fallback on PSCI/smp_ops if no other DT based method is
> > detected */
> > - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
> > - return false;
> > -
> > return platform_can_secondary_boot() ? true : false;
> > }
>
> This check was added recently, because the UP build was broken.
I should have found that out. Sorry about the noise and thanks for the review.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
