On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:00:07PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:15:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Wolfram Sang
> >> > <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > > The current implementation only works if the da9xxx devices are added
> >> > > before their drivers are registered. Only then it can apply the fixes to
> >> > > both devices. Otherwise, the driver for the first device gets probed
> >> > > before the fix for the second device can be applied. This is what
> >> > > fails when using the IP core switcher or when having the i2c master
> >> > > driver as a module.
> >> >
> >> > > So, we need to disable both da9xxx once we detected one of them. We now
> >> > > use i2c_transfer with hardcoded i2c_messages and device addresses, so we
> >> > > don't need the da9xxx client devices to be instantiated. Because the
> >> > > fixup is used on specific boards only, the addresses are not going to
> >> > > change.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> (r8a7791/koelsch)
> >>
> >> Can I get a Fixes tag or some indication of if it should apply
> >> to v4.9 or as a fix for v4.8.
> >
> > I'd say:
> >
> > Fixes: 663fbb52159cca ("ARM: shmobile: R-Car Gen2: Add da9063/da9210 regulator quirk")
> >
> > and should go to 4.8. Geert?
>
> That's right. CC stable, for v4.1+ and any LTS(I) it's been backported to.
Thanks, got it.
