On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:15:58PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Wolfram Sang > <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The current implementation only works if the da9xxx devices are added > > before their drivers are registered. Only then it can apply the fixes to > > both devices. Otherwise, the driver for the first device gets probed > > before the fix for the second device can be applied. This is what > > fails when using the IP core switcher or when having the i2c master > > driver as a module. > > Thanks a lot! > That could also happen when irqc is a victim of deferred probing. > > > So, we need to disable both da9xxx once we detected one of them. We now > > use i2c_transfer with hardcoded i2c_messages and device addresses, so we > > don't need the da9xxx client devices to be instantiated. Because the > > fixup is used on specific boards only, the addresses are not going to > > change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> (r8a7791/koelsch) Can I get a Fixes tag or some indication of if it should apply to v4.9 or as a fix for v4.8.
