On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:10:26PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > > We use the helper function which populates the smp_init pointer only in > > > case of SMP. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > could you describe the motivation for this change in the changelog? > > I am not sure what that could be. For me, it is pretty obvious that we > should not call smp_init() in case of !SMP ? Point taken. I have queued these up.
