Hi Simon, > > We use the helper function which populates the smp_init pointer only in > > case of SMP. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > could you describe the motivation for this change in the changelog? I am not sure what that could be. For me, it is pretty obvious that we should not call smp_init() in case of !SMP ? Regards, Wolfram