Hi Morimoto-san,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Currently I provide e.g.:
>>
>> topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-drivers-v3-rebased2
>> topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-integration-v3-rebased4
>>
>> The drivers branch needs only a rebase when Laurent's for/renesas-drivers
>> changes, while the integration branch needs a rebase after each
>> renesas-drivers release.
>>
>> I'll merge both of them in topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-v3-<date>-<version>.
>> Would that be OK for you?
>
> Thank you for your help.
> New naming rule is easy to understand for me.
> But, I wonder do we need -v3- ?
> We don't use old prototype on latest branch,
> so, <date> and <verion> is very enough ?
> Not a big deal though.
Indeed, we don't need it, as we can identify the prototype patchset version
from the individual topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-drivers-v* and
topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-integration-v* branches that are included.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
