Hi Morimoto-san, On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have pushed renesas-drivers-2016-06-28-v4.7-rc5 to >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git >> >> This tree is meant to ease development of platform support and drivers >> for Renesas ARM SoCs. It is created by merging (a) the for-next branches >> of various subsystem trees and (b) branches with driver code submitted >> or planned for submission to maintainers into the development branch of >> Simon Horman's renesas.git tree. >> >> Today's version is based on renesas-devel-20160627-v4.7-rc5. > > Can we have new version of below branches for -rc5 branch ? > Or for next new renesas-drivers ? > > salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-drivers-X > salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-integration-X > > My picky opinion is that > it is easy to understand that above additional branch has > same/similar naming of base branch... > > ex) salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-drivers-20160627-v4.7-rc5 Currently I provide e.g.: topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-drivers-v3-rebased2 topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-integration-v3-rebased4 The drivers branch needs only a rebase when Laurent's for/renesas-drivers changes, while the integration branch needs a rebase after each renesas-drivers release. I'll merge both of them in topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-v3-<date>-<version>. Would that be OK for you? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
