On 二, 2016-06-14 at 07:03 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Hi Zhang > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct thermal_zone_device > > > > > *thermal_zone_device_register(xxxx) > > > > > { > > > > > ... > > > > > if (!tz->tzp || !tz->tzp->no_hwmon) { > > > > > result = thermal_add_hwmon_sysfs(tz); > > > > > ... > > > > > } > > > > > ... > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > Does this mean "thermal_zone doesn't use lm-senser" ? > > I'd prefer to say of_thermal registered thermal_zone doesn't use > > lm- > > sensor. > > If you're really want to see hwmon interface, I think you should > > use > > thermal API (thermal_zone_device_register) directly. > Thank you for your feedback. > My driver is supporting both of_thermal and thermal API. > So, switching is not a big deal. > > But can you teach me why of_thermal doesn't use lm-senser ?? I don't know if there is a solid reason that we can not expose the hwmon interface. But just like the comment says, "/* No hwmon because there might be hwmon drivers registering */", given that of_thermal just parses THERMAL data of device tree, it is reasonable to me for exposing thermal interfaces only. thanks, rui