On 27.05.2016 10:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Given the use of PRR you saw is in a patch that's definitely not ready for
upstream, I think adding a full-fledged PRR driver is a bit premature.
I don't think anyone disagrees that it makes sense to be able to
determine ES version during runtime. The questions in my mind are how
to do it
I've made a proposal ;) And I'm happy to discuss technically about it.
and the urgency.
Regarding the urgency: Someone has accepted the hard coded PRODUCT register
(and MODEMR) being in renesas-drivers, now:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c?h=topic/gen3-latest#n177
I will drop the topic branch topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-v2-rebased1
from next renesas-drivers release, as it's definitely not ready.
People who want to use that branch can still merge it themselves.
Ok, fine, thanks. But maybe it makes sense to continue to discuss about
the SoC/revision detection independently, then. Maybe with less urgency ;)
Btw, what's about the MODEMR patch series? As it's from you and there
have been no further comments with v3, I'm somehow hoping to get it
integrated.
Best regards
Dirk
