On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Given the use of PRR you saw is in a patch that's definitely not ready for >>>> upstream, I think adding a full-fledged PRR driver is a bit premature. >> I don't think anyone disagrees that it makes sense to be able to >> determine ES version during runtime. The questions in my mind are how >> to do it > > I've made a proposal ;) And I'm happy to discuss technically about it. > >> and the urgency. > > Regarding the urgency: Someone has accepted the hard coded PRODUCT register > (and MODEMR) being in renesas-drivers, now: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c?h=topic/gen3-latest#n177 I will drop the topic branch topic/salvator-x-hdmi-prototype-v2-rebased1 from next renesas-drivers release, as it's definitely not ready. People who want to use that branch can still merge it themselves. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
