Re: R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kieran Bingham <kieran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:49:38 +0000
Authentication-results: bingham.xyz; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;bingham.xyz; dmarc=none action=none header.from=renesas.com;
Cc: <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <57456546.5020104@bingham.xyz>
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0

Hi Kieran

> I have added an initial patch to support the FDP1 in the clock
> framework, but I have not been able to correctly identify the actual
> clock parent.
> 
> For now I have assumed that it is R8A7795_CLK_S2D1.
> 
> Could you please confirm this selection, or help identify the true
> parent please?

OK, please wait

Follow-Ups:
- Re: R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage
  - From: Kieran Bingham

References:
- R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage
  - From: Kieran Bingham

Prev by Date: R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage
Next by Date: [PATCH 0/4] ARM: Renesas: R-Car3: Add product register support
Previous by thread: R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage
Next by thread: Re: R8A7795 FDP1 clock parentage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SOC] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux