Hi Simon, On Friday 22 Apr 2016 10:33:11 Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:14:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > >> This patch series introduces a DT-based driver for the R-Car System > > >> Controller, as found on Renesas R-Car H1, R-Car Gen2, and R-Car Gen3 > > >> SoCs. > > >> > > >> This is a dependency for the enablement of DU and VSP on R-Car H3, as > > >> the VSPs are located in a PM Domain. > > > > [...] > > > > >> Dependencies: > > >> - clk-renesas-for-v4.7 (which now includes "[PATCH v2 0/4] clk: > > >> renesas: R-Car SYSC PM Domain Preparation"; pull request sent), > > >> > > >> - renesas-devel-20160420-v4.6-rc4 (which already contains series > > >> > > >> "[PATCH v5 0/7] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for the R-Car System > > >> Controller"). > > >> > > >> I won't be resending follow-up series "[PATCH v5 00/12] ARM/arm64: dts: > > >> rcar: Add SYSC PM domains" for now, as it's unchanged, except for an > > >> ugly rebase due to dropping the commits to reference both DMA > > >> controllers on R-Car Gen2. > > >> > > >> For your convenience, I've pushed this, incl. all dependencies, to the > > >> topic/rcar-sysc-pd-v6 branch of > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git > > >> . > > >> Integration with renesas-drivers-2016-04-12-v4.6-rc3 is available in > > >> the > > >> topic/gen3-latest branch. > > >> > > >> This has been tested on r8a7779/marzen, r8a7790/lager, r8a7791/koelsch, > > >> r8a7794/alt, and r8a7795/salvator-x. > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > > > > > Thanks. I am not planning to queue these up at this point. > > > Let me know if that is not what you expected. > > > > As the clock maintainers has merged the preparatory clock work, and pushed > > > > it out into clk-next, you can now: > > 1. Pull the preparatory clock work in your tree, i.e. pull from: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-driver > > s.git > > > > tags/clk-renesas-for-v4.7-tag2 > > To my mind I need some kind of assurance from the clk maintainers that the > patches are stable there - in particular that the commit ids won't change. > And that both they and the ARM-SoC maintainers are happy with me pulling > it into my tree for this purpose. > > I do wonder, as we are almost at the closing point for queuing up changes > for v4.7 if, assuming the above patches are scheduled for inclusion in > v4.7-rc1, it might not be better for me to queue up this series for v4.8. Then that would delay a bunch of multimedia patch by one more kernel cycle, which I was hoping to avoid. > I could do that sooner rather than later in the devel branch of the renesas > tree if you like. > > > 2. Apply this series. > > > > After that, > > > > 3. I will rebase and update "[PATCH v5 00/12] ARM/arm64: dts: rcar: Add > > SYSC> > > PM domains" to match your current dt-for-v4.7 and arm64-dt-for-v4.7 > > (for > > dmas/dma-names changes and recently added mmc and sdhi nodes), > > and send it out, > > > > 4. You can apply it to a branch containing all of the above as > > prerequisites.> > > Is that OK for you? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
