On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:14:40PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:02:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> This patch series introduces a DT-based driver for the R-Car System
> >> Controller, as found on Renesas R-Car H1, R-Car Gen2, and R-Car Gen3
> >> SoCs.
> >>
> >> This is a dependency for the enablement of DU and VSP on R-Car H3, as
> >> the VSPs are located in a PM Domain.
>
> [...]
>
> >> Dependencies:
> >> - clk-renesas-for-v4.7 (which now includes "[PATCH v2 0/4] clk:
> >> renesas: R-Car SYSC PM Domain Preparation"; pull request sent),
> >> - renesas-devel-20160420-v4.6-rc4 (which already contains series
> >> "[PATCH v5 0/7] PM / Domains: Add DT bindings for the R-Car System
> >> Controller").
> >>
> >> I won't be resending follow-up series "[PATCH v5 00/12] ARM/arm64: dts:
> >> rcar: Add SYSC PM domains" for now, as it's unchanged, except for an
> >> ugly rebase due to dropping the commits to reference both DMA
> >> controllers on R-Car Gen2.
> >>
> >> For your convenience, I've pushed this, incl. all dependencies, to the
> >> topic/rcar-sysc-pd-v6 branch of
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git.
> >> Integration with renesas-drivers-2016-04-12-v4.6-rc3 is available in the
> >> topic/gen3-latest branch.
> >>
> >> This has been tested on r8a7779/marzen, r8a7790/lager, r8a7791/koelsch,
> >> r8a7794/alt, and r8a7795/salvator-x.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > Thanks. I am not planning to queue these up at this point.
> > Let me know if that is not what you expected.
>
> As the clock maintainers has merged the preparatory clock work, and pushed
> it out into clk-next, you can now:
> 1. Pull the preparatory clock work in your tree, i.e. pull from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/renesas-drivers.git
> tags/clk-renesas-for-v4.7-tag2
To my mind I need some kind of assurance from the clk maintainers that the
patches are stable there - in particular that the commit ids won't change.
And that both they and the ARM-SoC maintainers are happy with me pulling
it into my tree for this purpose.
I do wonder, as we are almost at the closing point for queuing up changes
for v4.7 if, assuming the above patches are scheduled for inclusion in
v4.7-rc1, it might not be better for me to queue up this series for v4.8.
I could do that sooner rather than later in the devel branch of the renesas
tree if you like.
> 2. Apply this series.
>
> After that,
> 3. I will rebase and update "[PATCH v5 00/12] ARM/arm64: dts: rcar: Add SYSC
> PM domains" to match your current dt-for-v4.7 and arm64-dt-for-v4.7 (for
> dmas/dma-names changes and recently added mmc and sdhi nodes),
> and send it out,
> 4. You can apply it to a branch containing all of the above as prerequisites.
>
> Is that OK for you?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
