On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:06 PM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > "Everest K.C." <everestkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 9:54 AM Mathieu Poirier > > <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Good morning, > >> > >> This is a case of old english vs. new english. Using "implementors" is still > >> correct. Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the > >> kernel tree. Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move > >> forward with this patch. > > I can work on changing all 33 instances of the word "implementor". > > Should I create a patchset for it ? > > Honestly, given that "implementor" is correct, this really doesn't seem > like it is worth the effort and churn. Noted. > jon With Regards, Everest K.C.
