Good morning, This is a case of old english vs. new english. Using "implementors" is still correct. Moreover, there are 33 instances of the word "implementor" in the kernel tree. Unless there is an effor to change all occurences I will not move forward with this patch. Thanks, Mathieu On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:15:57AM -0600, Everest K.C. wrote: > Following spelling error reported by codespell > was fixed: > implementors ==> implementers > > Signed-off-by: Everest K.C. <everestkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > index 348ee7e508ac..5c226fa076d6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > +++ b/Documentation/staging/remoteproc.rst > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ Typical usage > rproc_shutdown(my_rproc); > } > > -API for implementors > +API for implementers > ==================== > > :: > -- > 2.43.0 >
