Re: [PATCH 1/6] remoteproc: imx_rproc: correct ddr alias for i.MX8M

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Good morning,

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 04:34:54PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> 
> The DDR Alias address should be 0x40000000 according to RM, so correct
> it.
> 
> Fixes: 4ab8f9607aad ("remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MQ/M")

This commit was merged more than 3 years ago...  I don't see how such a blatant
mistake could have survived this long without causing problems or being noticed.
On top of things checkpatch gives me a warning.

> Reported-by: Terry Lv <terry.lv@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 144c8e9a642e..3c8b64db8823 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx8mq[] = {
>  	/* QSPI Code - alias */
>  	{ 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0x08000000, 0 },
>  	/* DDR (Code) - alias */
> -	{ 0x10000000, 0x80000000, 0x0FFE0000, 0 },
> +	{ 0x10000000, 0x40000000, 0x0FFE0000, 0 },

Without access to HW or the documentation there is no way for me to assess the
validity of this patch.  Marek, Iuliana and Daniel - please review and test this
patch.

Thanks,
Mathieu

>  	/* TCML */
>  	{ 0x1FFE0000, 0x007E0000, 0x00020000, ATT_OWN  | ATT_IOMEM},
>  	/* TCMU */
> 
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux