On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 03:56, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Il 28/03/24 15:38, Mathieu Poirier ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 01:49:58PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >> Il 21/03/24 16:27, Mathieu Poirier ha scritto:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:46:14AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >>>> When probing multi-core SCP, this driver is parsing all sub-nodes of
> >>>> the scp-cluster node, but one of those could be not an actual SCP core
> >>>> and that would make the entire SCP cluster to fail probing for no good
> >>>> reason.
> >>>>
> >>>> To fix that, in scp_add_multi_core() treat a subnode as a SCP Core by
> >>>> parsing only available subnodes having compatible "mediatek,scp-core".
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 1fdbf0cdde98 ("remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 3 +++
> >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> >>>> index 67518291a8ad..fbe1c232dae7 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> >>>> @@ -1096,6 +1096,9 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >>>> cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> >>>> for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> >>>> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(child, "mediatek,scp-core"))
> >>>> + continue;
> >>>> +
> >>>
> >>> Interesting - what else gets stashed under the remote processor node? I don't
> >>> see anything specified in the bindings.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sorry for the late reply - well, in this precise moment in time, upstream,
> >> nothing yet.
> >>
> >> I have noticed this while debugging some lockups and wanted to move the scp_adsp
> >> clock controller node as child of the SCP node (as some of those clocks are located
> >> *into the SCP's CFG register space*, and it's correct for that to be a child as one
> >> of those do depend on the SCP being up - and I'll spare you the rest) and noticed
> >> the unexpected behavior, as the SCP driver was treating those as an SCP core.
> >>
> >> There was no kernel panic, but the SCP would fail probing.
> >>
> >> This is anyway a missed requirement ... for platforms that want *both* two SCP
> >> cores *and* the AudioDSP, as that'd at least be two nodes with the same iostart
> >> (scp@1072000, clock-controller@1072000), other than the reasons I explained some
> >> lines back.
> >>
> >> ...and that's why this commit was sent :-)
> >>
> >
> > Please update the bindings with the extra clock requirement in your next
> > revision.
> >
>
> Ok.
>
> Can you please take only patch 1/2 of this series so that I can delay this one
> for a bit? I don't have time to work on that exactly right now.
>
It was added to rproc-next last week.
> Thanks,
> Angelo
>
>
