On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:46:14AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> When probing multi-core SCP, this driver is parsing all sub-nodes of
> the scp-cluster node, but one of those could be not an actual SCP core
> and that would make the entire SCP cluster to fail probing for no good
> reason.
>
> To fix that, in scp_add_multi_core() treat a subnode as a SCP Core by
> parsing only available subnodes having compatible "mediatek,scp-core".
>
> Fixes: 1fdbf0cdde98 ("remoteproc: mediatek: Probe SCP cluster on multi-core SCP")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> index 67518291a8ad..fbe1c232dae7 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c
> @@ -1096,6 +1096,9 @@ static int scp_add_multi_core(struct platform_device *pdev,
> cluster_of_data = (const struct mtk_scp_of_data **)of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>
> for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {
> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(child, "mediatek,scp-core"))
> + continue;
> +
Interesting - what else gets stashed under the remote processor node? I don't
see anything specified in the bindings.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> if (!cluster_of_data[core_id]) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> dev_err(dev, "Not support core %d\n", core_id);
> --
> 2.44.0
>
