Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: add module parameter to ignore ready flag from remote processor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/17/2023 9:36 AM, S.J. Wang wrote:
There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
application on the DSP and we don't have IPC between the cores.
Therefore, skip the wait for remote processor to start.

Added "ignoreready" flag while inserting the module to ignore remote
processor reply after start.
By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc.

Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 95da1cbefacf..ec298f8b019f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -26,9 +26,20 @@
  #include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
  #include "remoteproc_internal.h"

+#define IMX_DSP_IGNORE_REMOTE_READY		0
+
+/*
+ * Module parameters
+ */
+static unsigned int imx_dsp_rproc_ignoreready =
+IMX_DSP_IGNORE_REMOTE_READY; module_param_named(ignoreready,
+imx_dsp_rproc_ignoreready, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignoreready,
+		 "Ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off).");
+
  #define DSP_RPROC_CLK_MAX			5

  #define REMOTE_IS_READY				BIT(0)
+#define REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT			BIT(31)
Can we use a close bit with REMOTE_IS_READY,  like BIT(1)?

Sure, I'll send a v2.

Thanks,

Iulia




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux