>
> There are cases when we want to test a simple "hello world"
> application on the DSP and we don't have IPC between the cores.
> Therefore, skip the wait for remote processor to start.
>
> Added "ignoreready" flag while inserting the module to ignore remote
> processor reply after start.
> By default, this is off - do not ignore reply from rproc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> index 95da1cbefacf..ec298f8b019f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> @@ -26,9 +26,20 @@
> #include "remoteproc_elf_helpers.h"
> #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>
> +#define IMX_DSP_IGNORE_REMOTE_READY 0
> +
> +/*
> + * Module parameters
> + */
> +static unsigned int imx_dsp_rproc_ignoreready =
> +IMX_DSP_IGNORE_REMOTE_READY; module_param_named(ignoreready,
> +imx_dsp_rproc_ignoreready, int, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignoreready,
> + "Ignore remote proc reply after start, default is 0 (off).");
> +
> #define DSP_RPROC_CLK_MAX 5
>
> #define REMOTE_IS_READY BIT(0)
> +#define REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT BIT(31)
Can we use a close bit with REMOTE_IS_READY, like BIT(1)?
Best regards
Wang Shengjiu
> #define REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES 500
>
> /* att flags */
> @@ -285,6 +296,9 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_ready(struct rproc *rproc)
> if (!priv->rxdb_ch)
> return 0;
>
> + if (priv->flags & REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT)
> + return 0;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < REMOTE_READY_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
> if (priv->flags & REMOTE_IS_READY)
> return 0;
> @@ -903,6 +917,9 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> priv->rproc = rproc;
> priv->dsp_dcfg = dsp_dcfg;
>
> + if (imx_dsp_rproc_ignoreready)
> + priv->flags |= REMOTE_SKIP_WAIT;
> +
> dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc);
>
> INIT_WORK(&priv->rproc_work, imx_dsp_rproc_vq_work);
> --
> 2.17.1
