> Subject: [PATCH v1 1/3] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5: Send subdevice
> notifications before panic
>
> Subdevice notifications after a remoteproc has crashed are useful to any
> clients that might want to preserve data pertaining to the driver after the
> remoteproc crashed. Sending subdevice notifications before triggering a
> kernel panic gives these drivers the time to do collect this information.
>
> Change-Id: Id6e55fb038b70f54ff5854d2adff72b74b6a9570
Change-Id should be removed.
> Signed-off-by: Gokul krishna Krishnakumar <quic_gokukris@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c | 31
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h |
> 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c index 497acfb..89f5384 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
> #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
Seq the head file order.
> #include "qcom_common.h"
> #include "qcom_q6v5.h"
>
> @@ -94,6 +95,29 @@ int qcom_q6v5_unprepare(struct qcom_q6v5
> *q6v5) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_q6v5_unprepare);
>
> +static void qcom_q6v5_crash_handler_work(struct work_struct *work) {
> + struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5 = container_of(work, struct qcom_q6v5,
> crash_handler);
> + struct rproc *rproc = q6v5->rproc;
> + struct rproc_subdev *subdev;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(subdev, &rproc->subdevs, node) {
> + if (subdev->stop)
> + subdev->stop(subdev, true);
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Temporary workaround until ramdump userspace application
> calls
> + * sync() and fclose() on attempting the dump.
> + */
> + msleep(100);
I have no knowledge on your system setup, but just guess this is
not reliable.
> + panic("Panicking, remoteproc %s crashed\n", q6v5->rproc->name); }
It is remotecore crash, why use panic to crash the Linux side?
> +
> static irqreturn_t q6v5_wdog_interrupt(int irq, void *data) {
> struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5 = data;
> @@ -113,6 +137,9 @@ static irqreturn_t q6v5_wdog_interrupt(int irq, void
> *data)
> dev_err(q6v5->dev, "watchdog without message\n");
>
> q6v5->running = false;
> + if (q6v5->rproc->recovery_disabled)
> + schedule_work(&q6v5->crash_handler);
> +
> rproc_report_crash(q6v5->rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> @@ -134,6 +161,9 @@ static irqreturn_t q6v5_fatal_interrupt(int irq, void
> *data)
> dev_err(q6v5->dev, "fatal error without message\n");
>
> q6v5->running = false;
> + if (q6v5->rproc->recovery_disabled)
> + schedule_work(&q6v5->crash_handler);
> +
> rproc_report_crash(q6v5->rproc, RPROC_FATAL_ERROR);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> @@ -354,6 +384,7 @@ int qcom_q6v5_init(struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5, struct
> platform_device *pdev,
> if (IS_ERR(q6v5->path))
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(q6v5->path),
> "failed to acquire interconnect path\n");
> + INIT_WORK(&q6v5->crash_handler,
> qcom_q6v5_crash_handler_work);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h
> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h index 5a859c4..b1654be 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5.h
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ struct qcom_q6v5 {
> int handover_irq;
> int stop_irq;
>
> + struct work_struct crash_handler;
> +
> bool handover_issued;
>
> struct completion start_done;
> --
> 2.7.4
Regards,
Peng.
