Hi Mathieu,
On 3/2/21 6:57 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I have started to review this set - comments will be staggered over several
> days.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 12:14:49PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> To prepare the split code related to the control and the endpoint
>> devices in separate files:
>> - suppress the dependency with the rpmsg_ctrldev struct,
>> - rename and export the functions in rpmsg_char.h.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 22 ++++++++++------
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> index 9e33b53bbf56..78a6d19fdf82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> /*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2021, STMicroelectronics
>> * Copyright (c) 2016, Linaro Ltd.
>> * Copyright (c) 2012, Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> * Copyright (c) 2012, PetaLogix
>> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>> #include <uapi/linux/rpmsg.h>
>>
>> +#include "rpmsg_char.h"
>> #include "rpmsg_internal.h"
>>
>> #define RPMSG_DEV_MAX (MINORMASK + 1)
>> @@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ struct rpmsg_eptdev {
>> wait_queue_head_t readq;
>> };
>>
>> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +static int rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev);
>>
>> @@ -277,7 +279,7 @@ static long rpmsg_eptdev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
>> if (cmd != RPMSG_DESTROY_EPT_IOCTL)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - return rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(&eptdev->dev, NULL);
>> + return rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(&eptdev->dev);
>> }
>>
>> static const struct file_operations rpmsg_eptdev_fops = {
>> @@ -336,10 +338,15 @@ static void rpmsg_eptdev_release_device(struct device *dev)
>> kfree(eptdev);
>> }
>>
>> -static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + return rpmsg_eptdev_destroy(dev);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy);
>
> Below we have rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev() so it would make sense to have
> rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_ept().
>
> I would also rename rpmsg_eptdev_destroy() to rpmsg_chrdev_destroy_ept() and
> export that symbol rather than introducing a function that only calls another
> one. You did exactly that for rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev().
This function is used in rpmsg_ctrl to remove eptdev devices.
As device_for_each_child request a specific function prototype I do not only
export but change function prototype.
I can squash all in one function but that means that the "data" parameter is
just always unused.
>
>> +
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
>> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
>> {
>> - struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ctrldev->rpdev;
>> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev;
>> struct device *dev;
>> int ret;
>> @@ -359,7 +366,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
>>
>> device_initialize(dev);
>> dev->class = rpmsg_class;
>> - dev->parent = &ctrldev->dev;
>> + dev->parent = parent;
>> dev->groups = rpmsg_eptdev_groups;
>> dev_set_drvdata(dev, eptdev);
>>
>> @@ -402,6 +409,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_ctrldev *ctrldev,
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev);
>>
>> static int rpmsg_ctrldev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> {
>> @@ -441,7 +449,7 @@ static long rpmsg_ctrldev_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
>> chinfo.src = eptinfo.src;
>> chinfo.dst = eptinfo.dst;
>>
>> - return rpmsg_eptdev_create(ctrldev, chinfo);
>> + return rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(ctrldev->rpdev, &ctrldev->dev, chinfo);
>
> Not sure why we have to change the signature of rpmsg_eptdev_create() but I may
> find an answer to that question later on in the patchset.
Here I need to break dependency with rpmsg_ctrldev that will move to the
rpmsg_ctrl.c. rpmsg_eptdev_create doesn't need it but just parent devices to be
attached to.
I will add more explicit information about this, in the commit message.
Thanks,
Arnaud
>
>> };
>>
>> static const struct file_operations rpmsg_ctrldev_fops = {
>> @@ -527,7 +535,7 @@ static void rpmsg_chrdev_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
>> int ret;
>>
>> /* Destroy all endpoints */
>> - ret = device_for_each_child(&ctrldev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_eptdev_destroy);
>> + ret = device_for_each_child(&ctrldev->dev, NULL, rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy);
>> if (ret)
>> dev_warn(&rpdev->dev, "failed to nuke endpoints: %d\n", ret);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..0feb3ea9445c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2021.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__
>> +#define __RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__
>> +
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR)
>> +/**
>> + * rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev() - register char device based on an endpoint
>> + * @rpdev: prepared rpdev to be used for creating endpoints
>> + * @parent: parent device
>> + * @chinfo: assiated endpoint channel information.
>> + *
>> + * This function create a new rpmsg char endpoint device to instantiate a new
>> + * endpoint based on chinfo information.
>> + */
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *parent,
>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy() - destroy created char device
>> + * @data: parent device
>> + * @chinfo: assiated endpoint channel information.
>> + *
>> + * This function create a new rpmsg char endpoint device to instantiate a new
>> + * endpoint based on chinfo information.
>> + */
>> +int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data);
>> +
>> +#else /*IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR) */
>> +
>> +static inline int rpmsg_chrdev_create_eptdev(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
>> + struct device *parent,
>> + struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
>> +{
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int rpmsg_chrdev_eptdev_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + /* This shouldn't be possible */
>> + WARN_ON(1);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /*IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG_CHAR) */
>> +
>> +#endif /*__RPMSG_CHRDEV_H__ */
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
