RE: [PATCH v2 08/17] remoteproc: Allocate synchronisation state machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: mardi 24 mars 2020 22:46
> To: bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ohad@xxxxxxxxxx; Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx>; s-
> anna@xxxxxx; peng.fan@xxxxxxx; Arnaud POULIQUEN
> <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxx>; Fabien DESSENNE
> <fabien.dessenne@xxxxxx>; linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/17] remoteproc: Allocate synchronisation state
> machine
> 
> This patch allocates a synchronisation state machine, either provided or
> not by users, in order to enact the proper behavior requested by the
> platform or specific scenarios.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 59
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 02dbb826aa29..1578a9c70422 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1955,6 +1955,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev)
>  	kfree(rproc->firmware);
>  	kfree(rproc->ops);
>  	kfree(rproc->sync_ops);
> +	kfree(rproc->sync_states);
>  	kfree(rproc);
>  }
> 
> @@ -2035,6 +2036,59 @@ static int rproc_alloc_sync_ops(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static int rproc_alloc_sync_states(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				   const struct rproc_ops *boot_ops,
> +				   const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops,
> +				   struct rproc_sync_states *sync_states)
> +{
> +	struct rproc_sync_states *st;
> +
> +	/* At least one set of operation is needed */
> +	if (!boot_ops && !sync_ops)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* We have a synchronisation state machine, no need to build one */
> +	if (sync_states) {
> +		st = kmemdup(sync_states, sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!st)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +

I think a check between sync_states and boot_ops/sync_ops may be needed here
even if it is platform driver responsibility to provide coherent configuration
As soon as one of the sync_states is set at true, sync_ops must be provided
As soon as one of the sync_states is set at false, boot_ops must be provided

Regards,
Loic

> +		/* Nothing else to do */
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Allocate synchronisation state machine */
> +	st = kzalloc(sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!st)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We have a boot_ops and no sync_ops - build a state machine that
> +	 * does _not_ synchronise with an MCU.
> +	 */
> +	if (boot_ops && !sync_ops) {
> +		st->on_init = st->after_stop = st->after_crash = false;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We have a sync_ops and an no boot_ops - build a state machine
> that
> +	 * _only_ synchronises with an MCU.
> +	 */
> +	if (sync_ops && !boot_ops) {
> +		st->on_init = st->after_stop = st->after_crash = true;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	rproc->sync_with_mcu = st->on_init;
> +	/* And the synchronisation state machine to use */
> +	rproc->sync_states = st;
> +	/* Tell the core what to do when initialising */
> +	rproc_set_mcu_sync_state(rproc, RPROC_SYNC_STATE_INIT);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int rproc_alloc_internals(struct rproc *rproc, const char *name,
>  				 const struct rproc_ops *boot_ops,
>  				 const struct rproc_ops *sync_ops,
> @@ -2065,7 +2119,10 @@ static int rproc_alloc_internals(struct rproc *rproc,
> const char *name,
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> 
> -	return 0;
> +	/* Finally allocate the synchronisation state machine */
> +	ret = rproc_alloc_sync_states(rproc, boot_ops, sync_ops,
> sync_states);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
> 
>  /**
> --
> 2.20.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux