Re: [pull request][net-next V10 00/14] Add mlx5 subfunction support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:57 AM Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Apologies for the tardy question out of left field, but I've been
> > thinking about this some more. If I recall, the primary motivation for
> > this was a means to effectively address more VFs? But, why can't the
> > device simply expose more bus numbers?
>
> Several weeks back, Jason already answered this VF scaling question from you at discussion [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20201216023928.GG552508@xxxxxxxxxx/

True, although I didn't really consider the full cost argument at the
time because the core answer was "They can't", however, the fact is,
PCI can.

Regards,
Edwin Peer

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux