On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 07:39:31PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote: > From: Jiaran Zhang <zhangjiaran@xxxxxxxxxx> > > According to the RoCE v1 specification, the sl (service level) 0-7 are > mapped directly to priorities 0-7 respectively, sl 8-15 are reserved. The > driver should verify whether the value of sl is larger than 7, if so, an > exception should be returned. > > Fixes: d6a3627e311c ("RDMA/hns: Optimize wqe buffer set flow for post send") > Signed-off-by: Jiaran Zhang <zhangjiaran@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@xxxxxxxxxx> > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 10 +++++++++- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c > index 7a1d30f..69386a5 100644 > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c > @@ -427,9 +427,10 @@ static inline int set_ud_wqe(struct hns_roce_qp *qp, > void *wqe, unsigned int *sge_idx, > unsigned int owner_bit) > { > - struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev = to_hr_dev(qp->ibqp.device); > struct hns_roce_ah *ah = to_hr_ah(ud_wr(wr)->ah); > struct hns_roce_v2_ud_send_wqe *ud_sq_wqe = wqe; > + struct ib_device *ib_dev = qp->ibqp.device; > + struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev = to_hr_dev(ib_dev); > unsigned int curr_idx = *sge_idx; > int valid_num_sge; > u32 msg_len = 0; > @@ -489,6 +490,13 @@ static inline int set_ud_wqe(struct hns_roce_qp *qp, > V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_36_TCLASS_S, ah->av.tclass); > roce_set_field(ud_sq_wqe->byte_40, V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_40_FLOW_LABEL_M, > V2_UD_SEND_WQE_BYTE_40_FLOW_LABEL_S, ah->av.flowlabel); > + > + if (unlikely(ah->av.sl > MAX_SERVICE_LEVEL)) { > + ibdev_err(ib_dev, > + "failed to fill ud av, ud sl (%d) shouldn't be larger than %d.\n", > + ah->av.sl, MAX_SERVICE_LEVEL); > + return -EINVAL; > + } We should not print for things like this, IIRC userspace can cause the ah's sl to become set out of bounds Jason