Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] IB CM tracepoints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:32:28PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Jul 10, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:06:01AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> Hi-
> >> 
> >> This is a Request For Comments.
> >> 
> >> Oracle has an interest in a common observability infrastructure in
> >> the RDMA core and ULPs. One alternative for this infrastructure is
> >> to introduce static tracepoints that can also be used as hooks for
> >> eBPF scripts, replacing infrastructure that is based on printk.
> > 
> > Don't we already have tracepoints in CM, why is adding more RFC?
> 
> One of these patches _replaces_ printk calls with tracepoints.
> Is that OK?

Seems OK? I'd rather have the trace points be self consistent than a mix
of things spilling into pr_debug.

If someone wants to debug the CM it is clearly better to use the
complete set of tracepoints, right?

Jason




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux