Re: [PATCH V3 for-next 0/8] Refactor control path of bnxt_re driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 6:00 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 12:10:57PM -0500, Devesh Sharma wrote:
> > This is the first series out of few more forthcoming series to refactor
> > Broadcom's RoCE driver. This series contains patches to refactor control
> > path. Since this is first series, there may be few code section which may
> > look redundant or overkill but those will be taken care in future patch
> > series.
> >
> > These patches apply clean on tip of for-next branch.
> > Each patch in this series is tested against user and kernel functionality.
> >
> > v2->v3
> >
> > v1->v2
> > patch 0001
> > patch 0003
> > patch 0004
> > patch 0008
>
> Seems like something went wrong with this change log
Did "double-minus" (--) before each line played any role here?
>
> > Devesh Sharma (8):
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor queue pair creation code
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace chip context structure with pointer
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor hardware queue memory allocation
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor net ring allocation function
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor command queue management code
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor notification queue management code
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor doorbell management functions
> >   RDMA/bnxt_re: use ibdev based message printing functions
>
> Applied to for-next
Thanks!
>
> Jason



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux