On 1/8/2020 5:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > >> Parav Pandit (4): >> IB/mlx5: Do reverse sequence during device removal >> IB/core: Let IB core distribute cache update events >> IB/core: Cut down single member ib_cache structure >> IB/core: Prefix qp to event_handler_lock > > I used qp_open_list_lock in the last patch, and I'm still interested > if/why globally serializing the qp handlers is required, or if that > could be rw spinlock too. > My understanding is as in email of patch-2, its open_list_lock. probably there isn't too much contention, but yes it can be changed to rw spinlock. > Otherwise applied to for-next > Thanks.
