Re: rxe panic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please make tests with Linux upstream.
Thanks.

Zhu Yanjun

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:39 AM Frank Huang <tigerinxm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, zhu
>
> Can you show some patches about these problems?
>
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:08 AM Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I agree with you, Leon. I have fixed several problems similar to this
> > in the Linux upstream. Not sure whether this problem is fixed or not
> > in Linux upstream.
> >
> > Zhu Yanjun
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:29 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 03:23:53PM +0800, Frank Huang wrote:
> > > > hi leon
> > > >
> > > > I can not get what you means, do you say the rxe_add_ref(qp) is not needed?
> > >
> > > It is not what I'm saying.
> > >
> > > The use of rxe_add_ref(qp) assumes that QP can't disappear while it is
> > > called. From what I see in the code, rxe_responder() doesn't guarantee
> > > that.
> > >
> > > Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux