On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 14:25 -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:06:41AM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > Please don't send new RDMA drivers in pull requests to net. This > > > driver is completely unreviewed at this point. > > > > This was done because you requested a for a single pull request in an > > earlier submission 9 months ago. I am fine with breaking up > > submission, > > even though the RDMA driver would be dependent upon the virtual bus and > > LAN > > driver changes. > > If I said that I ment a single pull request *to RDMA* with Dave's acks > on the net side, not a single pull request to net. > > Given the growth of the net side changes this may be better to use a > shared branch methodology. I am open to any suggestions you have on submitting these changes that has the least amount of thrash for all the maintainers involved. My concerns for submitting the network driver changes to the RDMA tree is that it will cause David Miller a headache when taking additional LAN driver changes that would be affected by the changes that were taken into the RDMA tree. We can hash this out later if need be, since it is clear there are changes needed to the current series.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
