Re: [PATCH RFC rdma-core] verbs: relaxed ordering memory regions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/19/2019 9:29 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Haggai Eran wrote:
>> +/* Use the new version of ibv_reg_mr only if flags that require it are used. */
>> +#define ibv_reg_mr(pd, addr, length, access) ({\
>> +	const int optional_access_flags = IBV_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING;
>> \
> 
> We need to set aside more bits for optional as we can't keep revising
> this

Sure. Is 10 bits okay?

#define IBV_ACCESS_OPTIONAL ((1 << 10) - 1) << 8

> 
>> +	struct ibv_mr *__mr; \
>> +	\
>> +	if (__builtin_constant_p(access) && \
>> +	    !((access) & optional_access_flags)) \
>> +		__mr = ibv_reg_mr(pd, addr, length, access); \
>> +	else \
>> +		__mr = ibv_reg_mr_iova2(pd, addr, length, (uintptr_t)addr, \
>> +					access); \
> 
> Missing brackets around addr
> 
> This also wants to be a ?: expression to avoid the ({}) extension
Sure, I'll do that.

Thanks,
Haggai




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux